
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
<title>Depth Gauge - 826/826.1</title>
<link>https://members.theihe.org/forums/posts.aspx?group=214541&amp;topic=1489270</link>
<description></description>
<lastBuildDate>Sun, 7 Jun 2026 17:13:51 GMT</lastBuildDate>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2019 13:19:35 GMT</pubDate>
<copyright>Copyright &#xA9; 2019 Institute of Highway Engineers</copyright>
<atom:link href="https://members.theihe.org/forums/topic_rss.asp?group=214541&amp;id=1489270" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link>
<item>
<title>Depth Gauge - 826/826.1</title>
<link>https://members.theihe.org/forums/posts.aspx?group=214541&amp;topic=1489270</link>
<guid>https://members.theihe.org/forums/posts.aspx?group=214541&amp;topic=1489270</guid>
<description><![CDATA[<div class="Item-Header DiscussionHeader" style="color: #333333; margin: 5px 0px 10px; padding: 0px; border: 0px;">
<div class="AuthorWrap" style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; border: 0px;"><span class="Author" style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; border: 0px;">JulieW&nbsp;</span></div>
<div class="Meta DiscussionMeta" style="color: #70727c; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; border: 0px;"><span class="MItem DateCreated" style="margin: 0px 8px 0px 0px; padding: 0px; border: 0px;"><time title="May 9, 2017 10:09AM" datetime="2017-05-09T10:09:58+00:00">May 2017</time></span></div>
</div>
<div class="Item-BodyWrap" style="color: #333333; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; border: 0px;">
<div class="Item-Body" style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; border: 0px;">
<div class="Message" style="margin: 5px 0px; padding: 0px; border: 0px;">I've just discovered that the above depth gauge is no longer permitted under TSRGD 2016. Does anyone know why, I can't find any discussion about it? Is there a replacement gauge I am missing?<br />
Thanks</div>
</div>
</div>]]></description>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2019 14:19:06 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>https://members.theihe.org/forums/posts.aspx?group=214541&amp;topic=1489271</link>
<guid>https://members.theihe.org/forums/posts.aspx?group=214541&amp;topic=1489271</guid>
<description><![CDATA[SimonMorgan <br />May 2017 <br /><br />I asked this very question at the DfT's Traffic Signs Technical Working Party in June 2016. The answer I got (as it appears in the official minutes) was: "WD [DfT] replied that it could possibly be installed using the Planning Regulations, whilst MY [Highways England] thought that the Environment Agency had their own powers to install these".<br /><br />More recently, a draft of the new Traffic Signs Manual Chapter 4 has been given a limited circulation for 'peer review'. Whilst discussing fords, it makes no mention of depth gauges. The IHE made strong representations that they should be included, as their omission from Chapter 4 implies that DfT thinks these devices are no longer necessary and that authorities may remove them. The IHE considers that would be dangerous and could lead to lives being lost.]]></description>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2019 14:19:18 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>https://members.theihe.org/forums/posts.aspx?group=214541&amp;topic=1489272</link>
<guid>https://members.theihe.org/forums/posts.aspx?group=214541&amp;topic=1489272</guid>
<description><![CDATA[SimonMorgan <br />November 2018<br /><br />I am pleased to say that the water depth indicator is illustrated in the newly published version of TSM Chapter 4, with a note that it needs to be authorised by the relevant national authority.<br /><br />That's great news, but a somewhat backward step for a previously prescribed signs to now need site authorisation. Also, it's a pity that DfT didn't accede to IHE's other suggestion for this sign - to replace "M" with "m" as the correct international abbreviation for metres.]]></description>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2019 14:19:27 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>https://members.theihe.org/forums/posts.aspx?group=214541&amp;topic=1489273</link>
<guid>https://members.theihe.org/forums/posts.aspx?group=214541&amp;topic=1489273</guid>
<description><![CDATA[BrynBuck <br />December 2018<br /><br />I hope the logic was *new* sites requiring depth indicators should not be built; hopefully replacement of existing ones will not require site specific authorisation. <br /><br />Likewise I suppose where flooding happens under bridges the argument is "well fix the flooding"? <br /><br />Hopefully a future TSRGD will undo what appears to be a blunder.]]></description>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2019 14:19:35 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
