
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
<title>Zebra &amp; other crossings - 1997 Regs and TSRGD 2016</title>
<link>https://members.theihe.org/forums/posts.aspx?group=214541&amp;topic=1494418</link>
<description></description>
<lastBuildDate>Sun, 7 Jun 2026 17:11:58 GMT</lastBuildDate>
<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jun 2019 13:52:54 GMT</pubDate>
<copyright>Copyright &#xA9; 2019 Institute of Highway Engineers</copyright>
<atom:link href="https://members.theihe.org/forums/topic_rss.asp?group=214541&amp;id=1494418" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link>
<item>
<title>Zebra &amp; other crossings - 1997 Regs and TSRGD 2016</title>
<link>https://members.theihe.org/forums/posts.aspx?group=214541&amp;topic=1494418</link>
<guid>https://members.theihe.org/forums/posts.aspx?group=214541&amp;topic=1494418</guid>
<description><![CDATA[stu 
1:43PM 26th June 2019

Concerning Zebra crossings in the 1997 Regs, there were paragraphs that made it clear that if the road markings or the Belisha beacons were imperfect, disfigured or discoloured then that would not mean that the crossing ceased to be valid. Also, there was a paragraph regarding non-compliance i.e. under some circumstances, non-compliance did not mean that the crossing could not be treated as compliant.

I can't find reference to these in the TSRGD 2016. Are they still there?
]]></description>
<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jun 2019 14:52:54 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
