
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
<title>Road Safety Audit - Odd?</title>
<link>https://members.theihe.org/forums/posts.aspx?group=214541&amp;topic=1736576</link>
<description></description>
<lastBuildDate>Sun, 7 Jun 2026 17:13:52 GMT</lastBuildDate>
<pubDate>Tue, 9 May 2023 13:22:49 GMT</pubDate>
<copyright>Copyright &#xA9; 2023 Institute of Highway Engineers</copyright>
<atom:link href="https://members.theihe.org/forums/topic_rss.asp?group=214541&amp;id=1736576" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link>
<item>
<title>Road Safety Audit - Odd?</title>
<link>https://members.theihe.org/forums/posts.aspx?group=214541&amp;topic=1736576</link>
<guid>https://members.theihe.org/forums/posts.aspx?group=214541&amp;topic=1736576</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Hi,

Has anyone ever heard of a Stage 2 Road Safety Audit where the 2 auditors report that they driven behind traffic on a stretch of road several times in order to gauge the speed of that traffic and reported on their findings in the audit? - even though there has already been automated speed and volume monitoring carried out on the road - is it appropriate for them to adhoc report on traffic speed from literally looking at their speedo?

Thanks
Al]]></description>
<pubDate>Wed, 3 May 2023 22:01:22 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>https://members.theihe.org/forums/posts.aspx?group=214541&amp;topic=1737009</link>
<guid>https://members.theihe.org/forums/posts.aspx?group=214541&amp;topic=1737009</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Sounds like they were unaware of the automatic speed data. Perhaps they hadn't fully read the briefing. What they did seems a valid way to assess speeds when no better data is available, but unnecessary and less accurate when there is. ]]></description>
<pubDate>Tue, 9 May 2023 14:22:49 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
