
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
<title>Presence Detector</title>
<link>https://members.theihe.org/forums/posts.aspx?group=245536&amp;topic=1708059</link>
<description></description>
<lastBuildDate>Sun, 7 Jun 2026 11:53:02 GMT</lastBuildDate>
<pubDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2022 10:28:38 GMT</pubDate>
<copyright>Copyright &#xA9; 2022 Institute of Highway Engineers</copyright>
<atom:link href="https://members.theihe.org/forums/topic_rss.asp?group=245536&amp;id=1708059" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link>
<item>
<title>Presence Detector</title>
<link>https://members.theihe.org/forums/posts.aspx?group=245536&amp;topic=1708059</link>
<guid>https://members.theihe.org/forums/posts.aspx?group=245536&amp;topic=1708059</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Posted by Ian 25th February 2015

Hi I am looking at using a presence detector to put an input into a controller at one particular site so that can then let a common data base know so that it can implement a set of plans further up the road to allow more green time and clear the queues. The data base we have is Argonaut (Cloud Amber). I’ve looked on the internet for various presence detectors. Goldern River have various ones (M830, M100, M300). Ideally it would need to be above ground (two lanes to cover) and not Bluetooth as not many vehicles/phones are always switched on. Thanks Ian

ian.farr@bradford.gov.uk]]></description>
<pubDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2022 11:27:23 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>https://members.theihe.org/forums/posts.aspx?group=245536&amp;topic=1708060</link>
<guid>https://members.theihe.org/forums/posts.aspx?group=245536&amp;topic=1708060</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Posted by Pat Gregory 2nd March 2015<br /><br />telent AIMS in 2 lane mode will fit the bill.]]></description>
<pubDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2022 11:27:45 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>https://members.theihe.org/forums/posts.aspx?group=245536&amp;topic=1708061</link>
<guid>https://members.theihe.org/forums/posts.aspx?group=245536&amp;topic=1708061</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Posted by James Abel 30th March 2015<br /><br />Ian,<br />The Trafficam / Thermicam product from Flir may fit the bill and would be more reliable than the AIM-S. The cameras can do counting or operate as a standard loop or queue loop. In addition you can do some basic conditioning in the camera.<br /><br />We are using them for SCOOT detection and replacement for VA loops. You need only 2 cores between the camera and the Processor card, this can be connected directly to your IP comms.<br /><br />James]]></description>
<pubDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2022 11:28:11 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>https://members.theihe.org/forums/posts.aspx?group=245536&amp;topic=1708062</link>
<guid>https://members.theihe.org/forums/posts.aspx?group=245536&amp;topic=1708062</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Posted by David Hughes 13th November 2020<br /><br />Does anyone have any long term experience with using the FLIR detector? Thanks]]></description>
<pubDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2022 11:28:38 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
