
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
<title>Gritting Treatments on the Rights of Way Network</title>
<link>https://members.theihe.org/forums/posts.aspx?group=247945&amp;topic=1763056</link>
<description></description>
<lastBuildDate>Sun, 7 Jun 2026 17:02:21 GMT</lastBuildDate>
<pubDate>Wed, 20 Dec 2023 15:11:01 GMT</pubDate>
<copyright>Copyright &#xA9; 2023 Institute of Highway Engineers</copyright>
<atom:link href="https://members.theihe.org/forums/topic_rss.asp?group=247945&amp;id=1763056" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link>
<item>
<title>Gritting Treatments on the Rights of Way Network</title>
<link>https://members.theihe.org/forums/posts.aspx?group=247945&amp;topic=1763056</link>
<guid>https://members.theihe.org/forums/posts.aspx?group=247945&amp;topic=1763056</guid>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Can I ask for some feedback from colleagues about gritting treatments on the rights of way network (Public rights of ways/Bridleways etc) and does anyone have a different decision making process compared to adopted footways?</p>
<p> A query in Bridgend has arisen regarding a Network Rail bridge, installed by NR that has a PROW over it. We like many other LA’s have a different department that deal with the Rights of way network, so would be curious to know what/how decisions on treatment, if it is undertaken, is decided. </p>
<p>Thank you in advance.</p>]]></description>
<pubDate>Wed, 20 Dec 2023 13:54:31 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>https://members.theihe.org/forums/posts.aspx?group=247945&amp;topic=1763070</link>
<guid>https://members.theihe.org/forums/posts.aspx?group=247945&amp;topic=1763070</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Good Afternoon. Sorry no help from Norfolk, we do not treat any PROWS]]></description>
<pubDate>Wed, 20 Dec 2023 16:11:01 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
